The conflict of existence

 In reality, all existence is controlled by just two forces – the force of good and the force of evil. Different cultures refer to them differently - light and dark, white and black, or perhaps vying and yang (a representation of white and black).  I am sure there are also other terms I have not heard. All relate to some aspect of light.

What is darkness? The absence of light. In my 20s I spent some recreation time in spelunking (cave exploration). If you turn off all sources of light you are using, the cave becomes absolutely dark. You can put something right in front of your eye, but you will not be able to see even the faintest outline of your finger. This is a blackness you will never see on the surface. You may stand in the middle of a desert with both sun and moon on the opposite side of the earth, and no moisture in the sky to reflect light from surface sources. Even here you will never experience such a blackness, because the stars provide enough light to see your finger before you eye. Similarly, something white is reflecting all colors of the rainbow, while something black is absorbing all colors of the rainbow.

 Likewise, evil can be said to emit no goodness at all. The 'color' black absorbs all light waves and emits none. Or, like darkness, evil lurks in locations where it has minimal contact with goodness. In other words, the force of evil is a vacuum, sucking in anything good and releasing none.

I guess the conflict between good and evil, could be compared to the view I am seeing out the window. The light of morning sun has driven darkness into deep crevices. White snow is brightly reflecting the sunlight. There are morning shadows across the snow, dulling the reflection brightness. I see bare grey trees, and I see some green evergreens. Our life can be like that. You probably have known some people who are filled with the joy of life and are ready to help when needed – brightly reflecting the goodness of life. You likely know others whose goodness is shaded. They are willing to give when asked, but they face problems making them less free to reflect the goodness of life. Then there are those grey individuals, who are basically good, but have some (often hidden) dishonorable characteristics. Finally, there are “green” people who are constantly praised for an involvement which is good, but who otherwise reflects no goodness at all (and who may be covering evil actions elsewhere).

Perhaps one reason for the Star Wars popularity is these movies’ effective capture of the conflict between good and evil, with which we are constantly confronted.

Is our universe intertwined with another one?

 

Life as a human is an interesting period of time. Every person is the same, but different. And, in many ways, humans share characteristics with all animals. With some, we share many characteristics, but others with few. For example, all animals, whether worm or Elephant, have a brain which organizes and controls life. As we work upward to more and more complex animals, the brain also becomes more complex. When we get to humans, the brain takes care of all body needs. Once everything is in order, they tend to focus one or all of six questions every time something new comes before them. The questions: Who, What, Why, Where, When, and How. Many questions associated with our home, the Earth, have been answered. There is one very difficult question, however, that has become high on our list. Basically, it is ‘the nature of our universe.’ Bits and pieces of the answer have been collected. Complex computers have been able to theoretically reverse movement of the many stars, and calculate the time our universe was born. This is currently called “The Big Bang.” But what actually happened? It does appear that Einstein’s theory, energy = mass times speed of light squared (E = MC²) is correct, although reversed. It should be M = E/C². Therefore, the ‘Big Bang’ was not an explosion, but the sudden appearance of an unbelievably immense quantity of energy. Based on the chemistry we now know, it is assumed that this energy first created hydrogen, from which larger elements would then have been created.

Where would that energy have come from? That is a question that is probably unanswerable. What we can say is that, from the elements that were created our universe is built using four-dimension components – height, depth, distance, and irreversible time. We may argue on how much time it took to happen, but we know that a nice big solid ball was created and we call it Earth. Another, much larger and hotter ball, was also formed, and it keeps us warm. We look into the night air, and we see many distant big hot balls, which we call stars. All of this is slowly moving around, and we call it our universe. Thus, we are comfortable with what we have worked out. There may also be other separated universes, but they are of no concern to us.

There is one thing that does concern us, though. Periodically, people report seeing unusual, undesirable things in the air. Officially, they have been ignored and called imagination. Pictures and solid descriptions, however, keep cropping up. Furthermore, they have been observed coming out of water and even solid land. As we look into history, we find many more strange things. Construction with immense, cut stones. Things built on arithmetically precise calculations that no one would have been using at the time. Knives found in pyramids that were identical to those used today in hospital surgery. Reports and stories of people nine feet tall. Stories of strange ‘persons’ that looked nothing like today’s humans – and usually called gods. No longer can reports of unidentified flying objects be ignored. But how can one explain them?

One explanation that has been suggested is that another universe is intertwined with us. But why can’t we see it if that is the situation? First of all, we are in a huge three-dimensional ‘box’, working under unidirectional, irreversible time. We can’t conceive of anything outside this box. But is it possible? Physicists have suggested that there might be 10 dimensions. Consider: if we were in contact with a two-dimensional universe, they might see spots as we passed through their flat universe, but could only actually see us if our path happened to coordinate with their two dimensions. If we were to be in contact with another universe in a different ‘box,’ we would, likewise, only see them if they move within our dimensions. In addition, if we are in contact with another universe there is nothing that would prevent it being formed in a completely different system. We live in a box, as already indicated, and have no ability to conceive anything different. But our whole universe is built from nothing more than energy. Who is to say that something entirely different might also be created from energy?

When I was in school, the electron (about 4 x 10^-10 centimeters diameter) was considered the smallest item possible. Since then, the electron has been split, and several smaller units observed for less than a second before disappearing completely. All considered, these can be assumed packets of negative energy. So far as we know, every element in our universe, from hydrogen[1] to Lawrencium,[2] is constructed of similar but larger positive protons collected in groups, called nucleus, and surrounded by negative electrons. We cannot envision any other system, but if everything in our universe is actually constructed of energy, why couldn’t some other universe have a different construct? What about space, though? Wouldn’t we be bumping into solid items in the other universe? Not necessarily! Everything seen is not as solid as it seems. In reality, everything, from smallest to largest, is mostly air. A few elements have been actually measured. Oxygen, one of the most common element components of rock, plants, and animals, has been measured. The Oxygen atom is far too small to see, and if the nucleus were enlarged to the size of a ping pong ball, the eight electrons would be buzzing around the nucleus in an orbit with diameter of two football fields. Of course, the nucleus and electrons will be much closer, in our eye, but the solid to air relationship would still be the same. It is difficult for us to vision this but, providing there is no chemical or electric interaction, there is plenty of room for two objects to pass through each other. In fact, Jesus did exactly that (John 20:19).

---

[1] The smallest element, with one proton and one electron

[2] The largest element ever found or created, with 103 protons in the nucleus and 103 electrons buzzing around it like bees. The nucleus also contains either 157 or 163 neutrons (uncharged protons). Lawrencium is created in the laboratory, and is never found in nature.

I AM

I am. Two words, three letters – no object, no adjective, no adverb, no modifier of any kind – just “I am.” The shortest sentence in the English language, but a very powerful sentence. Today, we might use it in the place of “yes” in answer to certain questions. Within Judeo-Christian history it has a much greater meaning. Moses asked who he should say was sending him back to Egypt, perhaps thinking it might be Ra or one of the other Egyptian gods. The answer he received was, tell them, “I am has sent me to you.” (Exodus 3:14) As a result, “I am” became sacred, and any person using the sentence was stoned. Later, Jesus said, “before Abraham was born, I am!” (John 8:58). The implication of his words was not missed by his audience, and they were ready to stone him.

Let’s think about this for a moment. The implications are huge. I am. Not I was, or I will be. Simply, I am. These two words really say that, in no way is God restricted by time. To Him, everything is in the present – there is no past, and there is no future in His world. No past and no future also means there was no beginning and there will be no end. In other words, He exists in a timeless environment of some kind. This is a concept completely incomprehensible to us because we are imprisoned by a unidirectional, irreversible time and cannot conceive of anything else. Yet, this concept clarifies a very difficult dichotomy within Judeo-Christianity. That is: God gave us freedom of choice, but before we were born he had plans for us. How can there be both freedom of choice and predestination? Suddenly this becomes clear. We cannot understand how a timeless existence works, but if God knows no time, he knows both what options will confront us and what our decisions will be long before we are confronted by the necessity of making a choice!

I am. Not I am here, or I am there. Simply, I am. In other words, God is not restricted by a three dimensional space. He just is. If you can figure out how this works, let me know! Again, this is a concept completely foreign and incomprehensible to us because we live in the prison of three dimensional space. However, if this is true, the belief that God is everywhere at the same time (omnipresent) becomes a reasonable reality. Furthermore, the combination of his no time and no space existence makes the belief that He is all knowing (omnipotent) becomes a reasonable reality. Perhaps it makes some other incomprehensible beliefs understandable; I haven’t extended my thinking beyond this current discussion.

I have postulated a possible analogy in a past blog, but in reality we have no option but to make guesses about how this all works, based on our weak understanding of our own existence. The day may come that we will look around us and exclaim, “Oh, THAT’S how it works!” And at that point we probably won’t care any longer. 

Now, returning to “Before Abraham was born, I am.” Today, that is a pretty innocuous statement, but 2000 years ago it fell on the crowd like a thunder clap, and reverberated through them like the sound of a perfect bell. Today, there are those who say Jesus never claimed that he was God. Wrong! This was an unequivocal statement to, “I am God.” It was not misunderstood by those hearing him. Standing before them was a man who just claimed to be God. This was sacrilegious, and the crowd immediately reacted appropriately, picking up stones to stone him. 

As I indicated, we are imprisoned in a box of three dimensional space and unidirectional, irreversible time. We can conceive of nothing else. It is obvious that God lives somewhere outside this box, and is not constrained by it. In recognition of our inability to understand, Jesus also refers to himself as son. He prayed to the Father. Then he said that he had to return to the Father before he could send the spirit to his followers. We talk about, and accept, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as being three in one. But we don’t, and can’t, understand this – and understanding is a basic desire of humans.

I believe “Before Abraham was born, I am” was the only recorded time that Jesus unequivocally said he was God, but there are other recorded statements that imply this. John 10:30 – “I and the Father are one” was sufficiently understood by those hearing him that, once again, they were ready to stone him. Jesus also indicated the oneness in the prayer recorded in John 17 (verses 11 and 21). (In our “enlightened” world, psychiatrists would probably say Jesus has psychiatric problem and needs help!)   

One of the basic tenants of Christianity is that Jesus was both 100% human and 100% God. This is something that can only be accepted through trust – it cannot be explained.  Over the last 2000 years, there have been multiple heresies developed which attempt to circumvent the fact. A few of these heresies:

-          The Holy Spirit was placed upon the man, Jesus, when he was baptized, and it left him when he was crucified.

-          Jesus Christ was God’s first creation.

-          Jesus Christ was brother of Satan.

-          And other . . .

While they are presented in a way that sounds good to the ear, a critical examination of the scriptures quickly exposes their errors. We are left with the only explanation possible being that Jesus was the Christ, and that he was God. We can never fully understand this so long as we are imprisoned in our space-time box.

How long were Israelites in Egypt?

I am a Scientist, and I am a Christian. Their constant arguments are an irritation to me. If God is creator and supervisor of our world, their conclusions CANNOT disagree! But the two groups are constantly doing exactly that. Scientists have the tendency to reject the idea of God, and claim everything came about evolutionally, not via creation. Conversely, few Christians understand scientific methods, and they discount anything that might disagree with the bible and their interpretation of it.

Time has become a favorite ‘war’ subject for Christians, so I will use that as an example. God, living in a no-time ‘universe,’ has revealed methods of measuring time, although scientists don’t accept that viewpoint. Christians are inclined to say, “If it doesn’t agree with what is written in the bible, the measurement is wrong!”

As I said, time is one of the greatest sources of disagreement. Let’s look at just one situation. Christians and Hebrews both say that the Israelites spent 400 years in Egypt, a span recorded in both Bible and Hebrew records. The problem, though, is that Biblical dates can’t be historically verified until about 1050 BC, when Saul became king. This would have been about 400 years after Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt. If we turn to Egyptian historical verification, we find that Thutmose I reigned 1506-1493 BC, and his only son had died, leaving his daughter as next in line. She became Queen Hatshepsut. To become Pharaoh, however, a woman was required to have a son who would follow her when he became old enough to fill the position. This fits perfectly with the story of Moses, and Josephus’ Book 2 tells the story of his being trained to become pharaoh. (Josephus names Moses’ adoption mother as Thermuthis.) Eighty years later, the Pharaoh Moses dealt with was probably Thutmose IV, who reigned about 1400-1381 BC, less than twenty years. (Ramses II has been suggested, but he was pharaoh about 200 years later, which doesn’t fit into Israel history.)

So far, our Hebrew time schedule is in agreement with Egyptian history, so let’s move on. Exodus 12:40-41 says, “Now the length of time the Israelite people lived in Egypt was 430 years. At the end of the 430 years, to the very day, all the Lord’s divisions left Egypt.” If we now go 400 years back in Egyptian history, we come to Pharaoh Amenemhat III, who reigned 1860-1814 BC. His reign is regarded as Egypt’s golden age. His father, Senusret III, ruled from 1878 BC to 1839 BC, his military campaigns having given rise to an era of peace and economic prosperity.  The campaigns had reduced the power of regional rulers. Amenemhat III helped develop and inherited a country revival in craftwork, trade, and urban development.

This should be about the time Joseph and his father’s entire family entered Egypt. The limited description of the Egypt given in the Bible, however, does not seem to fit into this picture of Egypt in the 1800s BC. Furthermore, archeologists have found no evidence of Joseph during this period (more on this in a moment). Looking a bit deeper, in Genesis 15:13, we find: “Then the Lord said to (Abraham), “Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated.”(NIV) Then, in his ‘goodbye sermon,’ Steven says: “God spoke to (Abraham) in this way: ‘For four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own, and they will be enslaved and mistreated. But I will punish the nation they serve as slaves,’ God said, ‘and afterward they will come out of that country and worship me.” (Acts 7:6-7, NIV)

Returning to the introduction to Exodus, we find: “Now Joseph and all his brothers and all that generation died, but the Israelites were exceedingly fruitful; they multiplied greatly, increased in numbers and became so numerous that the land was filled with them. Then a new king, to whom Joseph meant nothing, came to power in Egypt. ‘Look,’ he said to his people, ‘the Israelites have become far too numerous for us. Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out, will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country.’ So they put slave masters over them to oppress them with forced labor, and they built Pithom and Rameses as store cities for Pharaoh.” (Exodus 1:6-11)

This passage fits perfectly with what we know about Pharaoh Amenemhat III. He did not seem to be a warrior, and would be logically concerned that some of the countries his father had defeated might reorganize and attack the Egyptian empire. The Hebrews had no real allegiance to Egypt, so it is also logical to think they might find it advantageous to join the invaders. In addition, his expansion plans were extensive and here was a group of potential slaves to do the building.  It therefore becomes apparent that the Hebrews were held in slavery for 400 years. This was not the period from Joseph to Moses! So, how long were Abraham’s descendants really in Egypt?

Let’s now return to Joseph. Egyptian Archeologists searched for evidence of his existence, but could find nothing within the time span he was supposed to live.  However, when the Step Pyramid was excavated, on the base of King Djoser’s statue an inscription was found, saying, “Imhotep, Chancellor of the King of Lower Egypt, Chief under the King, Administrator of the Great Palace, Hereditary Lord, High Priest of Heliopolis, Imhotep the Builder, the Sculptor, the Maker of Stone Vases …” That sure sounded like the Bible description of Joseph, but Christians said, “No, that can’t be. King Djoser ruled somewhere between 2682 BC and 2648 BC. That is about 800 years before Joseph.”

Since that discovery, Imhotep has been extensively researched. The more we understand him, the more it becomes obvious that, yes, this was Joseph, and the Bible only touches on his impact within Egypt. Imhotep has been described as “A commoner by birth who advanced to the position of one of the most important and influential men in Egypt through his natural talents.” He was the architect of King Djoser’s Step Pyramid. He was considered a god of science, medicine and architecture. He was a priest, vizier to King Djoser and the next three kings, Poet, physician, mathematician, astronomer, and architect. There is now a couple of TV programs focused on Imhotep, and it is apparent that the writer of Exodus did not ‘tell all.’ Had he done so, the focus would have been on Joseph, not God! Among other things, the archeologists found surgery implements exactly like those used today!! Pretty good evidence of alien contact in Egypt – the name was God, and he worked through Joseph.

I will now confidently say that the time between Joseph and the Exodus was not four hundred years, but the descendants of Abraham were in Egypt for about 1200 years. This also makes more logical the growth of the Hebrew nation from Jacob’s 70-person family to between two and three million that went with Moses. (There were 600,000 men of fighting age, so total count including elderly, women, and children had to be at least 2 million.)

Covid-19 pandemia

 This assessment, written by Bill O'Reilly, differs from what we are hearing elsewhere. O'Reilly is known for not posting something like this without doing some serious research on the subject!
_____________________________________

China’s Bio weapon, and Pelosi..

My wife Angie will tell you that I study history and world events fluently every day. I have studied China for many years. To get answers I need to questions, I call many I know in Washington on Capitol Hill (from my tenure on two Presidential campaigns and Presidential talks) and I ask them for straight up answers to better understand what affects us as a nation.

Well, in 2016 America elected a new Sheriff: Donald J Trump. For decades the Chinese walked all over America but the new President said “not anymore”. Trump literally strangled China’s economy to the point their economy was in its worst free fall ever. Trump negotiated a new 50 billion trade agreement. He had Xi by the proverbial balls. America’s economy was on fire and unstoppable. President Xi Jingping knew he could not beat the USA militarily and he knew any domesticated economic attack would fail as our economy was too strong. He had to act. But how?

Enter the USA democrats led by Pelosi and Schiff. Impeachment. A hoax. A distraction for our people and President. Xi Jingping and his thugs see this. They aren’t stupid. They have very intelligent intellectual thinkers in their government. Now you must understand , the Chinese regime are truly Barbarians. Notice I did not say ALL CHINESE. The Chinese people are a good people. I enjoy my interactions with them.

The communist regime has millions of its own citizens slaving in gulags simply for speaking against the government or openly practicing Christianity. Knowing they could not attack us openly they needed to be coy, like a deceptive fox. In my opinion, I believe the regime released a biological weapon upon the world that doesn’t kill everyone, but kills “enough,” especially the elderly and in-firmed. Back in WW 2 Hitler thought the same way. He got rid of what he considered the useless and rejects of society.

Trumps task force uses models to figure things. Xi used and uses “models” too. China's president figured that if he killed a few of his own (a few hundred thousand to them would be a few out of 1.4 billion people) and spread the virus to other nations (especially to the USA) they would “level the economic playing field” and not have fired a shot.

Losses of his own people were acceptable costs of a new war. When China’s own doctors attempted to sound the warning, they were immediately silenced. In fact one died and another has simply disappeared. Trump and the other allied leaders indeed KNOW this is what happened. They have under reported their own deaths. Trump knows he cannot outrightly seek retribution. His news conference today showed me this when he balked publicly about no outright retribution over Xi’s handling of this and he immediately brought up the “trade deal”. However, Trump wasn’t being weak, he too was now being coy. We know this was a biological weapon. The food market story is bullshit.

Xi knows we know it. Trump also today announced he sent two battle groups of destroyers and other ships to sea several days ago to fight drugs and rogue actors like Iran should they try anything.

I say he did this to show Xi he knows what has transpired (we have the greatest intelligence assets) and that they (the Chinese) should rethink further action. Politics is premier. We cannot overtly attack China for what they have done as we would also suffer greatly. We all know this.

But China has temporarily achieved its goal. America was literally consumed by Trumps phony impeachment brought by the ultra left democrats (supported by democrat rank and file and one Republican Mitt Romney) and Xi Jingping saw an opening. He took it. Xi did what Trump usually does...he walked onto the world stage and threw a grenade into the “room” and left. It exploded in the form of this worldwide pandemic. It brought the USA and the rest of the world to its knees and leveled the economic playing field.

Our economy is now near depression. Xi didn’t fire one bullet. Trump needed to up his game of chess and putting our Naval ships to sea was his next move. He said he is a “war” President. He is.

But now on not one but two fronts. One front is the virus and the other front is the Chinese. While the Saudi’s and Russians are screwing with oil prices they aren’t overtly doing what this pandemic is doing. The drug smuggling story for dispatching the Naval Force is bullshit and the world knows it. I am of the opinion Trump can indeed bring us back from this catastrophe albeit with a changed playing field.

But Trump is a genius in chess and financial matters. He’s become a champ at international politics too. I am sure Trump can once again lead the economy to even stronger strength and greatness the it was . He can do it quickly I’m sure of it. He has proved it. Xi Jingping needs to be sent a message loud and clear. NEVER AGAIN. We need to bring all of our critical manufacturing back from China beginning with our medicines they were recently threatening to withhold. We can do it immediately. Again, another reason for Trump putting to sea such a sizable Naval Force. Sending a clear message.

We all must ride out the next few weeks. Then we and the world pick up the pieces and move on. The democrats who have given Xi this opening wrapped in a bow must pay a heavy price in November as they (the democrats) truly have cost and continue to cost America precious lives by the phony scandals. Nancy Pelosi continues to help the Chinese by her daily shameless attacks upon the President and meddling in stimulus packages as she did this last weekend. Yesterday’s statements she made were truly appalling and the lowest of low. I didn’t think she could go any lower. What a disgrace she is to our nation.

But, Pelosi aside, make no mistake, China must and will be taught a lesson the likes they have never seen before and Trump is the man to pull the trigger.

We the people must teach the democrats the same lesson at the polls. They (the radical wing of the party) are the enemy of a free America. I am certain of it. The entire democrat party of our forefathers is dead. Remember people, Trump indeed tried to warn us all of the Conavirus in his State of the Union Speech. He spoke of it. He said he was on top of it.

After he spoke , Nancy Pelosi ripped up the speech calling Trumps words “a manifesto of lies”. She disgraced the country and all of our fellow honored citizens present in the House Chamber. Well she now has American blood on her hands. She is very majorly responsible for these needless deaths as well as the Chinese. Her and Adam Schiff.

The left and democrats laughed as she tore up his speech. Well, as they laughed the disease he just spoke of in that speech came to our shores. Republicans and Democrats alike are now dying. Your family members and mine. Our grandparents and middle aged citizens alike. Bodies are being loaded in trucks with forklifts in Brooklyn outside of hospitals. No one is safe. Our liberty is for the most part suspended. As we bury our dead (without proper funerals) from this calamity let’s drive the nails into the coffin of the Democrat party as well in November.

It’s time people. Stand up for your rights and your country! Our Liberty and survival is at stake! I am praying for God’s blessing on our nation. But, God also gave us the ability to think for ourselves and it’s time we placed blame for all this death where it belongs: on the doorsteps of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Xi Jingping directly. Wake Up America.

WAKE UP!

(written by Bill O'Reilly)

MENTAL FENCES

Fences - a word recently on many minds. There are many kinds of fences, both physical and mental. Basically, fences do one of two things – they either protect, or they contain. I grew up on a dairy farm with many wire fences. Some kept the cows at home, others protected garden and crops from destruction. In other words, they either contain or protect. On a broader scale, fences may be appropriately designed with people or smallest to largest animals in mind. All fences, however, have gates. They may be rarely, or frequently opened, and their function is to allow controlled passage without needing to tear down the fence.

There are also mental fences. People take a position and develop a fence to support their position. They very seldom, if ever, install a gate in their mental fence. In developing their position, they may listen to conflicting theories, but once a position is taken there is seldom a willingness to consider anything that conflicts with it. No matter how terrible their position turns out to be, or how logical a conflicting position may be, once their position has been established there is refusal to change. This is readily seen in politics, as well as many other aspects of life. One fence, very solid and well taken care of, is the creation/evolution fence. Each side is solid in belief, and in feeling that the other side is, basically, imbecilic in their beliefs. Personally, I believe both are correct, but they are like two blind persons feeling an elephant – and developing different pictures of the animal based on what they feel. For example, the sides on the creation/evolution arguments are looking at the same thing, but different aspects. On any observation, there are five questions, four ‘W’ and one ‘H’ questions. They are Who, Why, When, Where, and How. The creation side is looking only at Who (God) and Why (because He wanted to). They are minimally interested in the other three questions. The evolution side take a scientific approach, looking at Where, When, and How, with no interest in the Who and Why questions. The five questions must all be examined if a correct answer is to be obtained. One problem is that some giving here and there will be required, and neither is willing to give anything. Their fence remains very firm and cared for. I wrote a book on this controversy, “Scripture Versus Science: Reconciling God’s Ancient Wisdom with a Modern World View.” In it I attempted to show the unity path of considering all five questions. Neither side accepted if, with very few other than family and friends buying it. Christians tend not to be interested in anything on this subject that is not in the Bible. On the other hand, few evolutionists give any thought to the possibility of there being an all-powerful God.

When is a fact not a fact?

I am a physical scientist, and I spent 30 years of my life as a professor. One thing I observed is that most scientists are comfortable only when talking to other scientists. Those who are also professors spend substantial time training more scientists with whom they can be comfortable. There are a few who are interested and able to talk with the “uneducated.” I have now been retired for a number of years, with time to think about what we know and what we don’t know. My current objective is to give non-scientists some understanding of our world.

First, I should introduce myself. Most of my ancestors were in the United States by about 1800 and, so far as I know, all were farmers and blue-collar workers. My maternal grandfather spent one year in college, but, to the best of my knowledge, I am the first of my line to graduate from college and certainly the first to graduate with a PhD degree. (I do have one uncle who graduated from college and three aunts who were nurses.) When I graduated from High School my expectation was to spend my life as a farmer.  I dreamed of going to college, but neither my father nor I had the necessary resources. It would probably have been a mistake to have gone immediately to college anyway. Three years later life began to turn, and my dream became reality. After another nine years I officially became Dr. Harter, with expertise in Soil Chemistry.

One thing you should know about scientists – “fact” is not in their vocabulary. Or, perhaps, it shouldn’t be! Occasionally the word might be used for personal or financial reasons. Most basic concepts have been known for decades and, in many cases, centuries. Our job, then, is to refine what we know and better understand it. The basic agenda is to work from theories, or hypotheses. No theory can be satisfactorily proven true, but it can be proven false, so this is the basis of scientific work. Our hypothesis upon which a research program is: “If (A) is true, then (B) must be true.” We might feel that (A) is correct, but the research must be set up to test the truth of (B). We can never prove the truth of either (A) or (B), so additional tests are designed for (C), (D), (E), etc. until a convincing number are shown not to be false. At that point it becomes believed that (A) is probably correct, and often taken as being a fact. It can never, however, be considered a proven fact. Any time a correctly designed research study  proves the test theory false, the theory explaining (A) MUST be discarded and a new theory developed to explain the new information.

Discarding a known “fact” is not always easy. The earth was once thought to be flat, and center of the universe. As societies developed, a flat earth made less and less sense, so was discarded. Yet, there are still a few people who are certain that the earth is flat. Likewise, as the understanding of our relationship to heavenly bodies became increasingly understood, this center of the universe “fact” had to be abandoned. Any person who questioned the accepted position put himself at risk. Those who said the sun was actually the center were considered heretics. They were kicked out of the church, at best, and hung at worse.

The human nature is such that we need facts for a sense of security, and scientists are human (believe it or not!). It is only in scientific research that “fact” is (or should be!) forbidden. There are facts in our lives, many of which we have actually defined. For example, mathematics is full of facts, because we have designated them as facts. Base ten has been defined as fact for counting and calculating. Addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division were created for working with numbers – all and their functions are facts. All geometry and calculus functions are facts using these four functions. Computers must count using base two – they can only handle 0 and 1. (Printout, however, must be in base ten, because only computer programmers can think in base two.) Another group of facts: we use wood for building many things – fact. Wood comes from trees – fact. Trees grow from seed – fact. Seed is a fact and we can pretty well describe it, but to understand how it works is getting into science and theories – no facts.

This is how it works. Anything we create or define can be considered facts, because their existence was either created or defined by humans. Whether organic or inorganic, anything relating to things we have not actually created can never be considered factual, because we never completely understand formation and existence. In some cases, we can’t even study it, but are limited to observing related phenomena and, from that, create an appropriate theory. Those theories are most at risk of being discarded when related testable theories are shown to be false. 

- Dr. Robert Harter, Professor Emeritus, University of New Hampshire

The formation of all things

As I look out the window each morning, I am newly amazed at what I see. Everything looks solid and permanent. Yet, nothing is as it seems. The basic components of everything is actually ethereal. From the smallest weed to the tallest tree and from the Pekinese to the whale, every living thing is built of Oxygen (O), Carbon (C), and Hydrogen (H), with a few other elements thrown in when needed. Even these elements are not what they seem. All are made up of precise amounts of negative electrons and positive protons, and so small they can’t even be seen by powerful electron microscopes. If, for example, the oxygen proton-nucleus were to be enlarged to the size of a ping-pong ball, the electrons around it would form a ball the diameter of three football fields! Now, even this is not the full story. Researchers are beginning to realize that the electrons and protons are, in turn, similarly constructed of very small packets of energy --- there is really nothing of consequence there!! Somehow, when the energy is molded into electrons and protons a charge is created and, along with the charge, rejection and attraction forced are created.

Essentially, everything is created from nothing! Given recipes provide the differing elements that chemists like to play with in the laboratory. Uniting different elements (more recipes) forms molecules. If C is the dominant molecule element, we call it “organic.” If O is dominant, we call it “inorganic.” Organic molecules are connected, forming cell walls. The cells are filled with H2O (water) and a variety of important molecules. Appropriate quantity and type of cells are then the building blocks for all living organisms. Each cell contains the recipe for its full organism construction, so every organism can reproduce itself. Formation is a 'bit' more complex, but this is the basis upon which all living things are built.

Turning to the inorganic world, it is formed in the same manner except the constituent elements do not form molecules and cells. Rather, they are more closely associated three dimensionally to form crystals and rocks. Otherwise, the mineral elements are also 'built' from nothing but energy, just as are the organic elements. Since everything is built out of nothing but energy, nothing has weight as we think of it! Why, then, do we stay fastened to the surface? As I indicated, when the electrons and protons are formed, attractive and repulsive forces are created along with electrical characteristics. What we call weight is actually a measure of the attractive force. We stay on the surface because repulsive forces increase as two bodies become closer and closer and, at some point, the two forces become equal and can't come any closer - thus, we stay on the Earth surface.

All this is assumed to have happened after a 'Big Bang' as the many different elements were gradually formed. It is believed by some that hydrogen was the first element, then all others were created through interactions. Whatever the method of formation, most mineral elements are then consolidated into solid bodies.

And we are told that this all happened by chance??

The Highway of Life

In 1992 I attended an international Soil Science Conference held in Kyoto, Japan, and took Nancy (my wife) with me. We arrived in Tokyo a week early for a pre-meeting “soil science” tour. The next morning, we were picked up by a bus and headed north toward Osaka. We visited and discussed one or two soil sites each day, and the rest of the time was spent sightseeing. Most of the site-to-site travel was via major highway, but then we would turn off onto side roads, and sometimes they were quite narrow for a bus. The most memorable travel experience was making a 90 degree turn from one narrow road to another. This was in a small village, and a house roof extended right to the corner of the roads. A hostess was with us, and one of her jobs was to guide the driver from the bus rear, communicating via a police whistle code. She jumped out into the rain and guided his twice necessary back-ups in getting around the corner. We could have easily reached out the window and touched the house roof, but the corner was rounded with neither a touch of the roof nor scratch on the bus. Upon reaching Osaka, we were invited to an evening banquet and entertainment. The next morning, we boarded a Bullet Train for Kyoto. 

Isn’t that an image of our life? Many hours of our life-excursion time are spent traveling on “wide, easily navigated” highways, but there are constant needs to get off the highway. Marriage usually requires travel off the main highway. College will be a side trip along the way, and it may result in switching to a different, unexpected main highway. Jobs almost always require spending time on narrow roads, and can sometimes require clearing and building a new road upon which to travel. The list goes on, and many times we take “bullet trains” from one thing to another. We may or may not have planned out our side trips, but we constantly need guides to help along the way, particularly when we come to a dead end and need to turn around. 

Who are your guides? Parents should be your major guide for the first decade or two, but their guide-role should gradually decrease as they guide us into adulthood. Who have you chosen as your adulthood guide(s)? Peers? Politicians? Bosses? Those ahead of you on a ladder of success? Those you admire? There are many options, some good, some OK, and some bad. You may choose to follow different guides during different phases of your life. But who have you chosen for your supervising guide? Have you chosen God? This decision and obeying instructions may take you through some difficult paths, but will always bring you through these paths to a successful expedition conclusion.

The ultimate building block of all life.

I recently wrote that we are actually a package of organized energy. I wonder how many discounted me as crazy or, at best, a comedian. In reality, I am absolutely serious (and correct). Most readers have heard of Einstein’s development of the equation E=MC². No scientist has yet been able to disprove this as not true.  I do, however, question whether C is really the speed of light or was that simply a known very large number which was convenient to use. In any case, it should really be written M=E/C². Looking at it that way, so far as we know energy (E) has no weight, and speed does not carry any assumption of weight, so what are we measuring when we stem onto a scale? We are measuring the attractive force holding our mass to the surface of an extremely large mass, or package of energy, called “Earth.” That force is conveniently called “weight” and the magnitude is proportional to the size of two energy packages. Slowly, but surely, scientists are beginning to understand what is going on.

Let’s take a tour through the understanding of human bodies – opening of the doors of understanding is becoming more and more rapid. In the earliest days I am sure that there was no thought other than the unity of a human being. It may have been magic to see a woman’s stomach gradually enlarge followed by production of a baby. It probably was not long before this was associated to an enjoyable activity in which man and woman engaged. People, animals, trees, etc. were simply considered units which started out small and grew to “adulthood.” Humans, however, are curious and inventive. By the sixteenth century, AD, it was known that, if carefully formed, one could enlarge items by looking through glass. Hans Janssen was a lens maker, which provided his son, Zacharias, with plenty of lenses to play with and in 1595, at the age of seven, he invented the compound microscope (perhaps with his father’s help?).

The microscope opened up whole new worlds to investigate. Not only was it turned to the heavens in the form of a telescope, but very small things could be enlarged for examination. In 1665, Robert Hooke reported the discovery that wood was actually a collection of cells. In 1674 Antony van Leeuwenhoek was first to describe living cells, in this case, the green charophyte alga, Spirogyra. As a result of his work, the complexity of our makeup began to become understood, but how was a different story.

Even so far back as the Greek philosophers it was thought that everything was somehow made up atoms, but the atoms of the time were earth, fire, air, and water. (this, of course, led to the belief you could rearrange the components to form different materials, i.e. alchemy). In 1799, the French chemist Joseph Louis Proust established the fact that compounds were made up of atoms, and would always be of the same “recipe.” About 460 B.C., the Greek philosopher, Democritus, develop the idea that atoms would be the smallest unit into which a substance could be broken. However, it was not until the early nineteenth century that people begin again to question the structure of matter. An English chemist, John Dalton, reported that matter consists of elementary lumpy particles (atoms). Although he couldn’t describe a structure, the evidence pointed to something fundamental. In 1897, the English physicist, J.J. Thomson, discovered the electron and proposed an atom structure. Knowing electrons had a negative charge, Thomson proposed that the atom matter must also contain positive charge. His model looked like raisins stuck on the surface of a lump of pudding -- i. e. the “pudding” model of the atom.

In 1909, Ernest Rutherford found that most of the mass and positive charge of an atom is concentrated in a very small fraction of its volume, assumedly at the very center. Further experimentation indicated that positive charge of the atom must be concentrated in a very tiny volume producing an electric field. Rutherford therefore proposed a planetary model in which a cloud of electrons surrounded a small, compact nucleus of positive charge. An excursion into theoretical theory ensued in an attempt to understand what kept the electrons away from the nucleus. I won’t go into that, but simply say that, in 1913, Niels Bohr developed the Bohr model of the atom, in which electrons orbit the nucleus in particular circular orbits. The Bohr model was taught to me in High School Chemistry (1952-3) and college introductory Chemistry (1958). The Bohr model still had some theoretical problems, and has been displaced by a “modern model” which basically says the electrons are not in orbit, but in a cloud around the nucleus. I won’t go into that here either. I will just say that I was not introduced to this model until undertaking Physical Chemistry. By the time I finished graduate school, the Bohr model had been abandoned in Introductory Chemistry, and it wasn’t much longer until it had been abandoned in High School Chemistry.

By default, within this development, the electron was displaced as the smallest possible unit of mass. It has now been possible to split electrons into something even smaller. When it is split, there are small units flying away in different directions. Each with a unique path, so the units are given unique names. Are they, in fact, the smallest possible unit? Whether they are or not, we may have to stick with the idea, because these units only exist for microseconds and are gone. Why? Because they are small units of energy, which is quickly dispersed. All evidence also indicates that atom nuclei are also nothing more than conglomerations of energy. The whole idea carries some very interesting implications, but I will go into that elsewhere. For now, I will stop at the understanding of all mass being nothing more than organized energy.

Trump and Daniel - same story?

Are we currently experiencing a reenactment of Daniel in the Lion's Den?  No services today due to the snow, so we went to our "second team" TV preacher, David Jeremiah. He preached on Daniel 6, "Daniel in the Lion's den." He didn't make a whole lot of comparison with today, but he did make a comparison of the political actions (Daniel 6:4-7) to what is going on in Washington today. God put Daniel where he was, and, as the story plays out it is obvious that God was going to take care of him.    What I am about to say is going to raise the anger of some who are reading this, but when I step back and consider all that has happened over the last three years, the only way it really makes sense is that God has put Donald Trump into the President's chair. This has angered today's politicians just as did giving Daniel the supervision authority over Darius' entire kingdom. And they have reacted in a similar manner. Just in case a few readers don't know what happened next, the politicians of the day managed to maneuver the king into (very reluctantly) throwing Daniel into a den of hungry lions. He spent the night there, and the next morning the King pulled Daniel out, without a scratch on him. The perpetrators of this action were then thrown into the den and were devoured immediately.    In some regards, President Trump has already been thrown into the lion's den, and opposing politicians are egging the "lions" on, with expectation of him soon being devoured. The final act of this drama is yet to be seen, but if he was, indeed, placed there by God, he will come successfully through this trial and, as were the politicians of many years ago, his opponents will be thrown into oblivion.    Those who hate President Trump should read no farther. There is a possibility that your head will explode in anger. If God is really behind President Trump, just as Daniel is still revered by many today, with time he may join Presidents Washington and Lincoln as the most revered presidents of the United States.

The problem of conflicting visions

As I look back through my career, I realize that I have my feet in two worlds: One in the world of science, the other in the world of Christianity. Each seems to always be ridiculing the positions of the other. I wish I could bridge them and help people understand they are simply studying the same thing, but from different perspectives - much as two blind persons might be describing an elephant, one examining the tail and the other the trunk. Perhaps I am one piece of the bridge structure, but after centuries of study the supporting structure is still not complete, and I wonder whether it will ever be complete. So, I feel like I am moving back and forth via canoe, attempting to make sense of connections.

A Warning to Washington?

There was once a man named Ezekiel who had some very serious charges against Jerusalem, and filled a book with warnings. I wonder: If, instead, he were living in the U.S.A. today, and warning Washington, would chapter 22 of his book read something like the following?

-----------------------------------------

The word of the Lord came to me:

 “Son of man, will you judge her? Will you judge this city of corruption? Then confront her with all her detestable practices and say: ‘This is what the Sovereign Lord says: Your city that brings on herself doom by committing felony in her midst and defiles itself by lying to hide actions, you have become guilty because of the crime you have committed and have become defiled by the evil you have compiled. You have brought your days to a close, and the end of your years has come. Therefore, I will make you an object of scorn to the nations and a laughingstock to all the countries. Those who are near and those who are far away will mock you, you infamous city, full of turmoil.

“‘See how each of the elected leaders who are in you uses power to gain wealth. In you they have treated the poor with contempt; in you they have oppressed the legal immigrants and mistreated the poor. You have despised my holy things and desecrated my Sabbaths. In you are slanderers who commit felony and blame the honest; in you are those who freely spend money that is not theirs and make decisions that benefit themselves rather than those they represent. In you are those who dishonor women; in you are those who violate women by force, when they are unable to resist. In you one man commits adultery with his neighbor’s wife, another shamefully goes to prostitutes, and another violates children, both girls and boys. In you are people who accept bribes to direct their votes; you take interest and make a profit from the poor. You extort unjust gain from those who elect you. And you have forgotten me, declares the Sovereign Lord.

 “‘I will surely strike my hands together at the unjust gain you have made and the people you have destroyed in your midst. Will your courage endure or your hands be strong in the day I deal with you? I the Lord have spoken, and I will do it. I will disperse you among the nations and scatter you through the countries; and I will put an end to your corruption. When you have been defiled in the eyes of the nations, you will know that I am the Lord.’”

Then the word of the Lord came to me: “Politicians have become dross to me; all of them are the copper, tin, iron and lead left inside a furnace. They are but the dross of silver. Therefore, this is what the Sovereign Lord says: ‘Because you have all become dross, I will gather you into Washington DC. As silver, copper, iron, lead and tin are gathered into a furnace to be melted with a fiery blast, so will I gather you in my anger and my wrath and put you inside the city and melt you. I will gather you and I will blow on you with my fiery wrath, and you will be melted inside her. As silver is melted in a furnace, so you will be melted inside her, and you will know that I the Lord have poured out my wrath on you.’”

Again, the word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, say to the land, ‘You are a land that has not been cleansed or rained on in the day of wrath.’ There is a conspiracy of her Congressional representatives like a roaring lion tearing its prey; they devour people, take treasures and precious things and make many widows. Her Senators do violence to my law and profane the Constitution; they do not distinguish between the legal and the illegal; they teach that there is no difference between their acts and the Constitution; and they shut their eyes to the wishes of those who elect them, so that I am profaned among them. Her officials within her are like wolves tearing their prey; they ignore the cost to make unjust gain. The Supreme Court judges whitewash these deeds for them by false judgements and lying decisions. They say, ‘This is what the Constitution says’—when the Constitution contains no support. The people of the land practice extortion and commit robbery; they oppress the poor and needy and mistreat the foreigner, denying them justice, while awarding and supporting illegal immigrants.

 “I looked for someone among them who would build up the wall and stand before me in the gap on behalf of the land so I would not have to destroy it, but I found no one. So I will pour out my wrath on the politicians and consume them with my fiery anger, bringing down on their own heads all they have done, declares the Sovereign Lord.”

(or would this last paragraph read: “I looked for someone among them who would build up the wall and stand before me in the gap on behalf of the land so I would not have to destroy it, and I found one. You have ridiculed, belittled, voted down, and blocked the actions I have ordered. So, I will pour out my wrath on the politicians and consume them with my fiery anger, bringing down on their own heads all they have done, declares the Sovereign Lord.”)

Power = wealth

Power = wealth is a relationship recognized since people began to group together for mutual benefit. It didn’t take long for leaders to arise and organize the groups. It didn’t take long for the leaders to become absolute authorities, then absolutely obeyed Kings. Sooner or later, the king would be overrun by another king who had acquired a bit more power. After this system had been in place for thousands of years, a small, young society got “fed up” with it and decided to turn it around, making the society leaders absolutely obey the people. Unheard of! But it worked! They grouped themselves into towns, counties, and states. The state leaders developed a government which was to unite the states, adjudicate their different opinions to develop the best action plans, and supervise action. They called themselves the United States.

Not everyone agreed with this system. After all it was contrary to the status quo that had been in effect for many centuries. Plus, they were usually interested in taking power positions themselves. They began to fight the new system. The had very little success in the beginning, but they began to develop what seemed to be good arguments. By the early 20th century they had united themselves and became known as Tammany Hall, working quietly behind the elected government. World War II and Franklin D. Roosevelt pretty much destroyed the system. The survivors had to start over again, keeping themselves more hidden. Gradually they became more and more powerful, and you began to hear of a “Deep State” which was gradually positioning itself for government take over. I suggest you might pick up a Bible and read the first 24 chapters of Ezekiel. The United States in not yet the position of Israel at the time, but we are getting there, and are increasingly in danger of what happened as a result.

Thirty years ago, Oprah Winfrey interviewed a successful young businessman who had become aware of developing problems in our national government, and he outlined a number of things he would do to correct things if he were president. Today Donald Trump IS our president. He is now trying to accomplish the things he had outlined - - - and the Deep State members are apoplexic! He is trying to undo everything they have accomplished in their takeover plans. They are accusing him of everything they would and have done and would do in activating their takeover plans. They accuse him of using the presidency for financial benefit. They can’t understand that a wealthy business man is simply interest in righting a government ship that is increasingly in danger of sinking. Why would a billionaire spend his own money to be elected, just so he would not have his hands tied by desires of financial supporters? Why would he be refusing a nice salary if he is after every dollar he could find? This is beyond their understanding! Yes, he is not a politician and has had a steep learning curve, but he has been a quick learner. Yes, he uses Twitter too much, but it is the only way he can get his thoughts out to the people – mass media certainly does not help him on this. Yes, he has done things the Deep State considers disastrous, but they have regularly turned out successful. Politicians, however, know how to get people to take their “side” and support them.

The conflict of existence

In reality, all existence is controlled by just two forces – the force of good and the force of evil. Different cultures refer to them differently light and dark, white and black, or perhaps ying and yang (a representation of white and black).  I am sure there are also other terms I have not heard. All relate to some aspect of light.

What is darkness? The absence of light. I once spent some recreation time in spelunking (cave exploration). If you turn off all sources of light you are using, the cave becomes absolutely dark. You can put something right in front of your eye, but you will not be able to see even the faintest outline of your finger. This is a blackness you will never see on the surface. You may stand in the middle of a desert with both sun and moon on the opposite side of the earth, and no moisture in the sky to reflect light from surface sources. Even here you will never experience such a blackness, because the stars provide enough light to see your finger before you eye. Similarly, something white is reflecting all colors of the rainbow, while something black is absorbing all colors of the rainbow.

Likewise, evil can be said to emit no goodness at all. The 'color' black absorbs all light waves and emits none. Or, like darkness, evil lurks in locations where it has minimal contact with goodness. In other words, the force of evil is a vacuum, sucking in anything good and releasing none.

I guess the conflict between good and evil, could be compared to the view I am seeing out the window. The light of morning sun has driven darkness into deep crevices. White snow is brightly reflecting the sunlight. There are morning shadows across the snow, dulling the reflection brightness. I see bare grey trees, and I see some green evergreens. Our life can be like that. You probably have known some people who are filled with the joy of life, and are ready to help when needed – brightly reflecting the goodness of life. You likely know others whose goodness is shaded. They are willing to give when asked, but they face problems making them less free to reflect the goodness of life. Then there are those grey individuals, who are basically good, but have some (often hidden) dishonorable characteristics. Finally, there are “green” people who are constantly praised for an involvement which is good, but who otherwise reflects no goodness at all (and who may be covering evil actions elsewhere).

Perhaps one reason for the Star Wars popularity is these movies’ effective capture of the conflict between good and evil, with which we are constantly confronted.  

Who is God? / What is God?

Every person worships a god, whether they accept the idea or not. For the majority, their god is some type of being that has powers beyond their own. Some call themselves atheists, but you can be assured that they worship something, whether they realize it or not -- it may be money, it may be position, or it may even be self. There simply seems to be something within human beings that recognizes their own weakness and need. Over the ages, many societies have created and worshiped their own god. Their worship took many forms, and many have created idols to provide a visual focus for their worship. Judeo-Christians believe in one God, who is the former of all creation, is ruler of all, and rejects the attempt to create any kind of image through which He can be worshiped.

I am a Christian and fully subscribe to the Judeo-Christian position. I am also a physical scientist, and I have found nothing to dissuade me from this position. Rather, I have observed and experienced many things in my life that support the position. But I still must ask “Who and what is this God?” As I grow older this question grows in my mind, likely because I believe there is a God, and every day brings me nearer a face to face meeting. As to identity, in ancient times (still today??) knowing someone’s name gave you power over them. One Jewish tradition is that God appeared to Moses and commissioned him to take the descendants of Jacob out of Egypt. Moses asks, “Who shall I say sent me?” God responded, “I am. Tell them I am sent you.” In other words, I will not give you a name. Simply let them know I am in charge.

Even today, we want a name and/or an image. Lacking either we have no choice but to examine the Bible for hints of character. In the Jewish records that also became the Christian Old Testament, we see God as a ruler who expects acknowledgement and obedience. We see a strict judge who gives sentences appropriate to the “crime” – nothing more, nothing less. We also see a father providing behavior guides to his children, as well as serious discipline for misbehavior. And we see a father who loves and cares for his children.  Unfortunately, His children so misbehaved that, as we read the record, his strict discipline seems to stand out. However, as we read the Christian New Testament, His love and care for his children stands out, although discipline is still there for those who reject Him and his gifts. No, God is not a benign grandfather, as often depicted.

So, who is the God we worship? We live in a ‘box’ of three-dimensional space and unidirectional time, and must put everything into the perspective of this box. It is impossible to really understand God, because He is not in the box. Not only is His existence outside the box, but He created the box for us. Does, perhaps, “Star Wars” really depict the on-going battle actions outside the box? Is, perhaps, God really a ‘force’ which we absolutely cannot understand and have no hope to describe? One thing is certain, there is a rebellion which we also cannot see or understand. If you accept the understanding of an all-powerful God, you must also accept the presence of a Satan who is in rebellion, always seeking a way to destroy God. Somewhere outside our existence box there is a perpetual war raging between Satan’s forces and God’s Angels, but Satan’s rebellion is always destroyed just when it seems to be ready to destroy God’s force. The rebellion is a spiritual war, but battles are also fought within our existence box. Who’s side are you on?